0120122324
10-15-2012
Anthony L. Fisher, Complainant, v. Michael B. Donley, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.
Anthony L. Fisher,
Complainant,
v.
Michael B. Donley,
Secretary,
Department of the Air Force,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120122324
Agency No. 9X1M12011
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated April 4, 2012, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Contract Negotiator at the Agency's Wright-Patterson Air Force Base facility in Ohio.
On March 21, 2012, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American) and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when: (1) on November 14, 2011, he asked his supervisor about the availability of mentorship and was told it would be addressed at a later date, and that "if one is going through the motions - progress is tough"; and (2) on June 5, 2011, he was moved to a non-supervisory position in ASC/WNSK and told that the move was due to "the body of work" which included him being identified in several EEO complaints.
The Agency dismissed claim 1 for failure to state a claim, and claim 2 for failure to contact an EEO counselor in a timely manner.
The instant appeal followed. In his appeal, Complainant states that, after reviewing the EEO counselor's report and his complaint, there was a miscommunication and that the complaint "did not address the true material matters" that he presented to the counselor. Complainant said that a situation that was discussed was not intended to become the basis for a complaint "nor did [he] intend to claim that the situation was discriminatory in and of itself." In a later submitted brief, Complainant indicates that the mentorship issue was not intended to be part of the complaint. Complainant goes into detail regarding his removal from a supervisory position
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Given that Complainant asserts he did not intend to raise the events of claim 1 in his complaint, the Commission need not address that matter further.
Regarding claim 2, EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action. In this case, the record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on June 5, 2011, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until November 29, 2011, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 15, 2012
__________________
Date
2
0120122324
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120122324