Andrew L. Colvin, Complainant,v.Lawrence J. Delaney, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 18, 2001
03A10059 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 18, 2001)

03A10059

04-18-2001

Andrew L. Colvin, Complainant, v. Lawrence J. Delaney, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Andrew L. Colvin v. Department of the Air Force

03A10059

April 18, 2001

.

Andrew L. Colvin,

Complainant,

v.

Lawrence J. Delaney,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 03A10059

MSPB No. AT-1221-00-0010-W-1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

On February 2, 2001 the petitioner filed a petition with the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (Commission) asking for review of the

Merit Systems Protection Board's (MSPB) final decision on his case dated

January 3, 2001.

The petitioner filed an appeal with the MSPB. The MSPB characterized

the appeal as concerning a letter of reprimand dated April 2, 1999.

The petitioner contended that he was retaliated against, in part, for

EEO activity.

The MSPB's initial decision dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

It reasoned that the petitioner did not engage in protected whistle

blower activity.

Under 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(b), where the MSPB dismisses a mixed case

appeal for lack of jurisdiction, the agency must promptly notify the

petitioner in writing of the right to contact an EEO counselor within 45

days of receipt of the agency notice and to file an EEO complaint, subject

of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107, which lists grounds under which complaints must

be procedurally dismissed.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

The petitioner is advised that by operation of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(b),

the agency is required to process the allegations of discrimination as

"non-mixed" matters pursuant to 29 C.F.R. Part 1614. The agency shall

notify petitioner of the right to contact an EEO counselor within 45

calendar days of receipt of this decision, and to file an EEO complaint,

subject to � 1614.107. The date on which the petitioner filed the

appeal with the MSPB shall be deemed the date of initial contact with

the EEO counselor, unless the petitioner previously contacted an EEO

counselor on the same matter. You have the right to file a civil action

in an appropriate United States District Court, based on the decision

of the MSPB, within 30 calendar days of the date that you receive this

decision.<1>

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole

discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not

extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and

the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the

paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 18, 2001

__________________

Date

1The petitioner asks that the Commission consolidate this case with

another claim pending for hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge.

The petitioner is advised that under 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106(d), he may

file a motion with the administrative judge (AJ) to amend the claim that

is pending before the AJ to include issues or claims like or related to

those raised in the claim pending before the AJ. The AJ has discretion

on whether to grant the motion.