American Armament Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsAug 31, 194243 N.L.R.B. 834 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of AMERICAN ARMAMENT CORPORATION and UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, DISTRICT No. 50, C. I. O. Case No. R-4125.Decided August 31, 194 Jurisdiction : munitions manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives . existence of question : re- fusal to accord petitioner recognition until certified by the Board; contract automatically renewed after filing of petition held no bar; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : production and maintenance em- ployees, excluding watchmen and clerical and supervisory employees. Dlr. Merwin Lewis, of New York City, for the Company. 'Mr. Valentine Lesko and Mr. Bruno Olimizri, of Greensburg, Pa., and Mr. Abe Vales, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for the U. M. W. Mr. Joseph A. Rossi and Mr. Nicholas Stironi, of Pittsburgh, Pa., fo'r the A. F. of L. Mr. Seymour J. i,Spelman, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petition duly filed by United Mine Workers of America, District No. 50, C. I. 0., herein called the U. M. W., alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of-American Armament Corporation, Derry, Pennsyl- vania, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before W. G. Stewart Sherman, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held- at Greens- burg, Pennsylvania, on August 6, 1942. The Company, the U. M. W., and International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local No. 1451, A. F. of L., herein called the A. F. of L.; appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard; to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: 43 R B, No 134 834 AMERICAN ARMAMENT 'CORPORATION 835 FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY American Armament Corporation, a Delaware corporation, having its principal office in New York City; and plants in Allentown and Derry, Pennsylvania, is engaged in the manufacture and assembly of bombs and other types of munitions. The plant at Derry, Pennsyl- vania, is the one involved in this proceeding. In a 1-year period preceding July 1, 1942, the Company purchased raw materials valued in excess of $1,000,000, 50 percent of which originated outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The value of the finished products fdr the same 1-year period was in excess of $1,000,000, of which approx- imately 100 percent was shipped to places outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Company concedes that it is engaged in com- merce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. IL THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED United Mine Workers of America, District No. 50, is a labor organ- ization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company.' International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local No. 1451, is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION I In September, 1941; the U. M. W. began an organizational drive among the employees of the Company. During the succeeding months and up to the present, the U. M. W. continued this drive, meeting with the employees on several occasions,. and securing signed member- ship cards: On May 23, 1942, by telephone and by registered mail, the U. M. W. informed the Company that it represented a majority of its employees and requested that the Company arrange for a conference. The Company expressed doubt as to the claims of the U. M. W. and took the position that the question of representation should be settled in an election conducted by the Board. . There is an existing contract between the A. F. of L. and the Company in which membership in the A. F. of L. is a condition of em- ployment. This agreement, executed on June 25, 1941, contains a provision for automatic renewal from year to year in the absence of 30 days' notice by either party prior ' to the expiration of any yearly period. The A. F. of L. contends that the contract is a bar to this proceeding, since it was renewed automatically on June 24, 1942, in the absence of any 30-day notice by either party. The Company took the position 836 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL' LABOR RELATIONS BOARD that this -pas a dispute between two unions which should be settled by the Board. I - We note, however, that more than 30 days prior to the expiration of the first year period of the contract, the Company had notice of the U. M. W.'s claim to represent a majority of the employees, and we note further that the present petition -was filed more than 30 days before June 24, 1942. In,view of these circumstances, we find that the auto- matic renewal of the contract does not constitute a bar to a determination of representatives at this time." A statement of the Regional Director, introduced in evidence at the, hearing, shows that the U. M. W. represents a substantial number of employees in the, unit hereinafter found appropriate.' We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning Of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The parties agreed that all production and maintenance employees, excluding clerical and supervisory workers, should be included in the appropriate unit. This is the unit provided for under the existing contract. . ,The Company, the U. M. W., and one representative of the A. F. of L. agreed at the hearing to exclude watchmen. Counsel for the A. F. of L., however, went on record in opposition to this exclusion. ,The Company employs approximately 15 armed and uniformed watchmen (or guards) who have exclusive police jurisdiction in re- spect to the protection of plant property. Some guards have been commissioned as deputies by the State, and the remainder are in the process of being so deputized. The Company characterized the bulk of its production and maintenance employees as common labor. We shall exclude the watchmen from the unit. We find that all production and maintenance employees of the Company, excluding watchmen, clerical' and supervisory employees, i See Matter of International Harvester Company Tractor Works and Chicago Die Sinkers Local No. 100 of the International Die Sinkers Conference , 36 N L . R. B 520; Matter of Mitchell Battery , Company and United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local ##11110, affiliated with the C . 1. 0, 35 N L R B . 198 ; Matter of Vincent Steel Process Company and International Union , United Automobile Workers of America, C I O , 32 N L R. B 991 ; Matter of Utica Knitting Company and Textile Workers Federal Labor Union #21500, A. F. of L , 23 N L R. B 55 ; Matter of Colonic Fibre Company, Inc . and Cohoes Knit Goods Workers Union No. 21511,, A. F. of L., 9 N. L. R B 658 2 The Regional Director reported that the U. M. W. submitted 81 application-for-mem- bership cards , all bearing apparently genuine original signatures , 80,of which , bore' dates in May 1942, and 1 in June 1942. Of these, 62 bear, names of employees in the unit alleged to be appropriate , which unit contained 120 employees on July 1, 1942. The A. F. of' L supports its claim of interest in this proceeding by the contract of June 25, 1041, with the Company. AMERICAN ARMAMENT CORPORATION 837 constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargain- ing within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the employees in_ the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period of July 10, 1942, subject to the limitations and additions set forth therein.3 DIRECTION OF, ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article' III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with American Arma- ment Corporation, Derry, Pennsylvania, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted' as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction of Election, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Sixth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all employees of the Company in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period of July 10, 1942, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Mine Workers of America, District No. 50, affiliated with the Con- gress of Industrial Organizations, or by International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local No. 1451, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. CHAIRMAN MILL1s took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. 3 The pay-roll period of July - 10, 1942; is in"accordance with a stipulation,of the parties. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation