Albers Super Markets, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Apr 4, 1946

67 N.L.R.B. 67 (N.L.R.B. 1946)

In the Matter of ALBERS SUPER MARKETS, INC. and WAREHOUSEMEN'S
UNION, LOCAL No. 661, AFFILIATED WITH INTERNATIONAL BROTHER-
HOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF
AMERICA, A. F. L.
Case No. 9-R-1952.-Decided April 4, 1946
Messrs . John C. Dempsey, A. J. Long, Jr., and M. W. Griesbaum,
of Cincinnati , Ohio, for the Company.
Messrs. J. W. Brown and Jack L. McCain, of Cincinnati , Ohio, for
the Union.
Mr. Conrad A. Wickham, Jr., of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by Warehousemen's Union, Local No.
661, affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauf-
feurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, A. F. L., herein called
the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen
concerning the representation of employees of Albers Super Markets,
Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, herein called the Company, the National Labor
Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice
before Allen Sinsheimer, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at
Cincinnati, Ohio, on January 25, 1946. The Company and the Union
appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity
to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce
evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made
at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
All parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
The Company is an Ohio corporation with its principal office and
place of business in Cincinnati. Ohio. It is engaged in the retail mer-
chandising, warehousing, and processing of groceries and related
products. These proceedings are concerned with the receiving, ware-
housing and food processing operations of the Company in Cincinnati,
CT N. L. R. B., No. 4. 67
68 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
from which merchandise is distributed to 20) of the Company's retail
stores in the greater Cincinnati area, both in Ohio and Kentucky.
During the past year the Company's total purchases of meats and
groceries exceeded $15,000,000, approximately 90 percent of which
was shipped to the Cincinnati warehouse from outside the State of
Ohio. During the same period the total sales of the Company's retail
stores exceeded $22,000,000, such merchandise being delivered from
its Cincinnati warehouse to its various retail stores, approximately
25 percent thereof being delivered to stores in the Commonwealth of
Kentucky.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the
meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
Warehousembn's Union, Local No. 661, is a labor organization,
affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauf-
feurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, A. F. L., admitting
to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the
exclusive bargaining representative of the Company's employees until
the Union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit.
A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear-
ing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of the
employees whom it seeks to represent in this proceeding.'
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT; THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
The operations involved in the present proceeding are the Com-
pany's warehouse, its repack or manufacturing department, and part
of its accounting department. All operations are located in three
buildings in Cincinnati which constitute the entire warehouse and
repacking group and house the controller's and other offices. The
warehouse and repack departments are under separate superintend-
ents, while the accounting department, which exercises supervision
over the Company's receivers, is under the controller. Because the
refrigeration equipment is located in the warehouse, the egg candling
department, which is really a part of the repack department, is lo-
cated in the warehouse and under its superintendent. A bakery lo-
I The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 12 authorization cards, all
of which bear the names of employees appearing on a list submitted by the Company, and
that these were 37 employees in the unit requested in the petition
ALBERS SUPER MARKETS, INC. 69
cated in the repack department, though concededly not a part thereof,
is under the supervision of the repack superintendent.
The Union is already the bargaining representative of the Com-
pany's approximately 90 warehouse employees by virtue of an exist-
ing contract, and has acted in this capacity since 1937.2 It now seeks
to add to the existing unit a group consisting of all the employees in
the repack department, plus the Company's receivers (listed on the
Company's records as "receiving audit clerks"), but excluding super-
visory and clerical employees. The Company agrees that the em-
ployees of the repack department would constitute a proper addition
to the warehousemen's unit, but opposes the inclusion of the receivers,
since they come under the cognizance and supervision of the account-
ing department rather than the warehouse.
The functions of the repack department include the repacking of
certain foodstuffs and roasting coffee. Its employees include stock-
men, packers, a coffee roaster and a bag-machine operator. The parties
agree that employees engaged in egg candling are functionally part
of this department, but that the bakery employees should not be in-
cluded in any voting group set up in this proceeding because they are
represented by a separate union. Accordingly, they agree that the
employees enumerated, exclusive of those in the bakery, should prop-
erly be included in the bargaining unit, but that the repack superin-
tendent and the repack forelady should be excluded as supervisors.
We find, in accordance with the agreement of the parties, that these
employees may be added to the existing unit if they so desire, and we
shall direct an election for the purpose of determining their desires in
the matter.
The only contested employees are the six receivers in the Company's
accounting department. These employees work out of small offices on
the docks checking incoming shipments as to quantity, condition of
the seals, and condition of the actual merchandise if it is of a perish-
able nature. Inspection of perishables is performed either by the chief
receiver, who the parties agree should be excluded as a supervisor, or
by a receiver who is also known as a "produce inspector" and who has
authority to reject perishable merchandise which he considers unsuit-
able. The receivers work alongside the unloaders, who are in the exist-
ing warehouse unit, listing and totaling the items of the incoming ship-
ments. Their lists are subsequently submitted to the main office to be
checked against the invoice by an invoice audit clerk. Although they
may occasionally perform manual work, this is infrequent. They per-
form their duties solely tinder orders from the accounting department
and are paid on a weekly salary basis.
2 Under this contract the Union represents "All employees of the employer engaged in
the handling , loading or unloading of freight or merchandise on docks or warehouses of
the employer, excepting supervisory employees, and further excepting office employees or
other employees not properly tinder the jurisdiction of the Union."
70 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
There was considerable dispute at the hearing as to whether or not
receivers were intended to be covered by the existing contract. It
appears that they came under the supervision of the warehouse super-
intendent until a few years ago, at which time they were transferred
to the controller 's office, with alleged changes in their duties . Never-
theless, their duties appear to be quite similar to those of checkers,
who are under the warehouse superintendent and are part of the pres-
ent bargaining unit. Checkers compare orders which have been filled
by order-runners with the order -lists submitted by the Company's
stores to insure proper delivery . They make no check as to the con-
dition of perishables . They may occasionally perform manual work
in a slightly greater degree than receivers. Receivers are paid slightly
more than checkers, and checkers slightly more than order-runners,
the latter two classifications being paid on an hourly basis. It appears
that, in some instances , order-runners may be promoted to checkers,
and thence to receivers, or even directly to receivers . Three of the
present six receivers were promoted directly from order-runners to
their present positions , while the other three were secured from outside
sources. There was also some question as to whether or not receivers
were ever required to be members of the Union. The evidence indicates
that some were and some were not.
The Company contends that the receivers cannot properly be in-
cluded in the bargaining unit inasmuch as their duties essentially
constitute the auditing of the vendor for the accounting department,
to which department they are solely responsible; that the warehouse
has no control over their activities ; and that there is no regular chan-
nel of promotion from the warehouse to receiver , but that receivers are
procured from any source which provides men with the peculiar
knowledge of merchandise required to perform receivers' work.
Conceding that the Company's arguments carry some weight, it
nevertheless appears that the duties of receivers are so similar in
nature to those of checkers , and are so closely associated with the work
of other warehouse workers, that there is a definite community of
interest among all these employees . For this reason, although we
do not regard them as part of the repack-employee class, we think that
the receivers may, as a group, be added to the existing warehouse unit
for purposes of collective bargaining if such is their desire. We will,
therefore, provide for a separate election in which they too may indi-
cate their desires in this regard.
We shall therefore direct that the question concerning representa-
tion which has arisen be resolved by separate elections by secret ballot
among the Company's employees, excluding, in addition to those spe-
cifically noted below, all office clerical employees, supervisors, assist-
ant supervisors, and any other supervisory employees with the author-
ity to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes
ALBERS SUPER MARKETS, INC. 71
in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, as
constituted in the following two voting groups :
(1) All the employees of the Company's repack department
at Cincinnati, Ohio, including the stockmen, packers, egg candlers,
coffee roaster and bag-machine operator, but excluding the su-
perintendent and the forelady of the said department;
(2) All the receiving audit clerks employed in the Company's
accounting department at Cincinnati, Ohio, excluding the chief
receiving audit clerk of the department.
The employees in the above groups eligible to vote in these elections
will be those who were employed during the pay-roll period imme-
diately preceding the date of the Direction of Elections herein, subject
to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. In the
event that the employees in either, or both, of the above groups select
the Union as their collective bargaining representative, that organiza-
tion may bargain for them together with, and as an integral part of, the
unit of warehouse employees for which the Union is presently the
bargaining representative.
DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act,
and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby
DmEcTEo that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Albers Super Mar-
kets, Inc., Concinnati, Ohio, elections by secret ballot shall be conducted
as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date
of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional
Director for the Ninth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the
National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections
10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among employees in each
of the two voting groups as set forth above, who were employed during
the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction,
including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period
because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and includ-
ing employees in the armed forces of the United States who present
themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who
have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired
or reinstated prior to the date of the elections, to determine whether
or not they desire to be represented by Warehousemen's Union, Local
No. 661, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
Chauffers, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, A. F. L., for the
purposes of collective bargaining.