Ahmad A. M. Halim, Complainant,v.Sean O'Keefe, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 12, 2002
05A20826 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 12, 2002)

05A20826

08-12-2002

Ahmad A. M. Halim, Complainant, v. Sean O'Keefe, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Agency.


Ahmad A. M. Halim v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

05A20826

August 12, 2002

.

Ahmad A. M. Halim,

Complainant,

v.

Sean O'Keefe,

Administrator,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration,

Agency.

Request No. 05A20826

Appeal No. 01A10154

Agency No. NCN-98-LaRC-A037

Hearing No. 120-99-6511X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Ahmad A. M. Halim (complainant) timely initiated a request to the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to

reconsider the decision in Ahmad A. M. Halim v. National Aeronautics

and Space Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01A10154 (May 7, 2002).

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,

reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party

demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision

will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations

of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

Complainant claims in his request for reconsideration that the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or

law, as it failed to address the alleged error of the EEOC Administrative

Judge (AJ), who, complainant contends, �allowed the complainant to

conduct deposition, interrogatories and admission, yet denied to

include the interrogatories, deposition, and admission before issuing

(considering) a summary judgment.� Complainant has not identified,

however, which of these forms of evidence, if any, that the AJ failed

to address in rendering her decision. Furthermore, our review of the

record on appeal reveals no indication that the AJ denied complainant

sufficient notice of her intention to issue a decision without a hearing,

that she denied him the opportunity to present the evidence he claims

was improperly excluded, or that the AJ excluded any evidence submitted

by complainant in rendering her decision in the complaint.

Accordingly, after a review of complainant's request for reconsideration,

the previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that

the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and

it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01A10154 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

�Agency� or �department� means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court

appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you

to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security.

See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �

2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request

is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an

attorney does not extend your time in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above (�Right

to File A Civil Action�).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 12, 2002

Date