Adi Worldlink, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telcommunications Americas, LLCDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Unpublished Board DecisionsJul 25, 201607-CA-157722 (N.L.R.B. Jul. 25, 2016) Copy Citation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ADI WORLDLINK, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. f/k/a SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICAS, LLC and Cases 07-CA-157722 TIM CURRY, OZIAS FOSTER, ROYCE ELLISON, MERVIN L. MCGIRT, CLARENCE COOK, KEVIN ASTROP and 20-CA-156284 NATHAN NESBIT, CHRIS CARETHERS, LAMAR HALL, LEON TOWNSEND, STEVEN LE, SEAN GOODSON ORDER TRANSFERRING PROCEEDING TO THE BOARD and NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE On April 12, 2016, Respondent Adi Worldlink (Worldlink) filed with the Board a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint in this proceeding, on the ground that the Charging Parties consented to its Labor Services Agreement (Agreement), including the provisions requiring individual arbitration of employment-related disputes, and that the Agreement should therefore be enforced according to its terms. Worldlink further asserted that there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute. On April 19, 2016, the General Counsel filed with the Board a response in opposition to Worldlink’s motion, and a cross-motion for summary judgment with respect to both Respondents on the ground that Worldlink’s Agreement violates Section 8(a)(1) of the Act as alleged, and that there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute. On the same date, the General Counsel also filed a motion to strike certain exhibits attached to Worldlink’s motion. Having duly considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the above-entitled proceeding be transferred to and continued before the Board in Washington, D.C., and that the hearing be postponed indefinitely. NOTICE IS GIVEN that cause be shown, in writing, filed with the Board in Washington, D.C., on or before August 8, 2016 (with affidavit of service on the parties to this proceeding), why either the Respondent’s or the General Counsel’s Motions should not be granted. Any briefs or statements in support of the motion shall be filed by the same date. Dated, Washington, D.C., July 25, 2016. By direction of the Board: Gary Shinners _____________________________ Executive Secretary Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation