Section 93.313 - [Effective until 1/1/2025] Institutional investigation reportThe final institutional investigation report must be in writing and include:
(a)Allegations. Describe the nature of the allegations of research misconduct.(b)PHS support. Describe and document the PHS support, including, for example, any grant numbers, grant applications, contracts, and publications listing PHS support.(c)Institutional charge. Describe the specific allegations of research misconduct for consideration in the investigation.(d)Policies and procedures. If not already provided to ORI with the inquiry report, include the institutional policies and procedures under which the investigation was conducted.(e)Research records and evidence. Identify and summarize the research records and evidence reviewed, and identify any evidence taken into custody but not reviewed.(f)Statement of findings. For each separate allegation of research misconduct identified during the investigation, provide a finding as to whether research misconduct did or did not occur, and if so- (1) Identify whether the research misconduct was falsification, fabrication, or plagiarism, and if it was intentional, knowing, or in reckless disregard;(2) Summarize the facts and the analysis which support the conclusion and consider the merits of any reasonable explanation by the respondent;(3) Identify the specific PHS support;(4) Identify whether any publications need correction or retraction;(5) Identify the person(s) responsible for the misconduct; and(6) List any current support or known applications or proposals for support that the respondent has pending with non-PHS Federal agencies.(g)Comments. Include and consider any comments made by the respondent and complainant on the draft investigation report.(h)Maintain and provide records. Maintain and provide to ORI upon request all relevant research records and records of the institution's research misconduct proceeding, including results of all interviews and the transcripts or recordings of such interviews.