holding that recovery is not permitted under RICO "for those pecuniary losses that are most properly understood as part of a personal injury claim."
Summary of this case from Alexander v. Boone Hosp. Ctr.No. 88-496.
December 5, 1988.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 849 F. 2d 1039.
holding that recovery is not permitted under RICO "for those pecuniary losses that are most properly understood as part of a personal injury claim."
Summary of this case from Alexander v. Boone Hosp. Ctr.following reasoning of Self
Summary of this case from Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.Full title:YOUNG ET AL. v. STANDARD OIL (INDIANA) ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 5, 1988
Second, it is clear that personal injuries are not compensable under RICO. See, e.g., Reiter v. Sonotone…
Jones v. AT&T Co.In light of these principles, it is well established, that an employer may unilaterally amend or terminate an…