From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windham v. Wray

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
2:22-cv-02099-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02099-WBS-EFB (PC)

02-08-2023

CHARLES WINDHAM, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES WRAY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 6, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 6, 2023, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; and

3. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days from the date of this and is warned failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Windham v. Wray

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
2:22-cv-02099-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Windham v. Wray

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES WINDHAM, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES WRAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 8, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02099-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)