From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Synthes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 31, 2012
Case No. 2:10 CV-03434-LKK-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10 CV-03434-LKK-KJM

01-31-2012

DEBRA WILSON, Plaintiff, v. SYNTHES and DOES 1 through 500, Defendant.

MILLER LAW INC. JOHN C. MILLER, JR. Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBRA WILSON SEDGWICK LLP MICHAEL F. HEALY DENNIS E. RAGLIN Attorneys for Defendant SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC


SEDGWICK LLP

Michael F. Healy (State Bar No.095098)

Dennis E. Raglin (State Bar No. 179261)

Attorneys for Defendant

SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


[Fed.R.Civ.P. 41]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel of record, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rules 41(a)(1) and (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party hereto shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

MILLER LAW INC.

By: John C. Miller, Jr.

JOHN C. MILLER, JR.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DEBRA WILSON

SEDGWICK LLP

By: Dennis E. Raglin

MICHAEL F. HEALY

DENNIS E. RAGLIN

Attorneys for Defendant

SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC

ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Wilson v. Synthes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 31, 2012
Case No. 2:10 CV-03434-LKK-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Wilson v. Synthes

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA WILSON, Plaintiff, v. SYNTHES and DOES 1 through 500, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:10 CV-03434-LKK-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)