From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Harrington

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1946
295 N.Y. 667 (N.Y. 1946)

Summary

In Wilson v. Harrington, 295 N.Y. 667, 65 N.E.2d 101, the court of appeals of New York affirmed a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court, which in turn had affirmed a judgment of the supreme court in favor of defendant.

Summary of this case from Wannebo v. Gates

Opinion

Submitted November 29, 1945

Decided January 17, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, ALEXANDER, J.

Benedict S. Rosenfeld and Albert Jakobson for appellant.

E.F. Sweeney, F.G. Mann and Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and DYE, JJ. Taking no part: MEDALIE, J.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Harrington

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1946
295 N.Y. 667 (N.Y. 1946)

In Wilson v. Harrington, 295 N.Y. 667, 65 N.E.2d 101, the court of appeals of New York affirmed a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court, which in turn had affirmed a judgment of the supreme court in favor of defendant.

Summary of this case from Wannebo v. Gates
Case details for

Wilson v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:WALTER F. WILSON, Appellant, v. EDWIN I. HARRINGTON, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 17, 1946

Citations

295 N.Y. 667 (N.Y. 1946)
65 N.E.2d 101

Citing Cases

Zinck v. Whelan

Prior to the adoption of a regulatory statute the New York Court of Appeals affirmed a short, conclusional…

Wannebo v. Gates

The complaint against the taxicab owner was dismissed. In Wilson v. Harrington, 295 N.Y. 667, 65 N.E.2d 101,…