From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Kurk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 18, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2526-WBS-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2526-WBS-CMK-P

07-18-2012

JOHNATHAN SAMUEL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KURK, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel responses to discovery (Doc. 17).

Plaintiff's request is premature. No defendant has yet been served and appeared in this action in order to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. Once a defendant has been served and appeared, placing this case at issue, plaintiff will be permitted to engage in discovery. Such discovery will be conducted without the assistance of the court, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless one of the parties does not respond appropriately to a proper discovery request. In such a situation, a proper motion to compel may be filed. Until such time as this case is at issue, however, any discovery motion is premature.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 17) is denied as premature.

____________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Kurk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 18, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2526-WBS-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Kurk

Case Details

Full title:JOHNATHAN SAMUEL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KURK, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2526-WBS-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)