Williams v. Evans

Full title: JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. MIKE EVANS, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 12, 2008

No. CIV S-07-1101 LEW GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1101 LEW GGH P.

March 12, 2008

ORDER

RONALD LEW, District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 16, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 16, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's June 27, 2007, motion for stay and abeyance of his petition is denied, and the petition is dismissed as unexhausted.