From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Runnel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 22, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1935 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1935 MCE GGH P.

September 22, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a prison disciplinary conviction received while he was incarcerated at California State Prison-Corcoran (CSP-Corcoran). CSP-Corcoran is located in Kings County. Kings County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.See Local Rule 3-120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Warren v. Runnel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 22, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1935 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Warren v. Runnel

Case Details

Full title:CARMON WARREN, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 22, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1935 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2006)