Summary
finding same Michigan statute similar to the Texas statute not preempted
Summary of this case from Truddle v. Wyeth, LLCOpinion
No. 06–1498.
2008-03-3
David Klingsberg, Steven Glickstein, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, N.Y., Carter G. Phillips, Counsel of Record, Daniel E. Troy, Rebecca K. Wood, Eamon P. Joyce, Quin M. Sorenson, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioners. David R. Parker, Counsel of Record, J. Douglas Peters, Charfoos & Christensen, P.C., Detroit, MI, Allison M. Zieve, Brian Wolfman, Scott L. Nelson, Washington, DC, Theodore Goldberg, David Bennet Rodes, Goldberg Persky & White, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Respondents.
David Klingsberg, Steven Glickstein, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, N.Y., Carter G. Phillips, Counsel of Record, Daniel E. Troy, Rebecca K. Wood, Eamon P. Joyce, Quin M. Sorenson, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioners. David R. Parker, Counsel of Record, J. Douglas Peters, Charfoos & Christensen, P.C., Detroit, MI, Allison M. Zieve, Brian Wolfman, Scott L. Nelson, Washington, DC, Theodore Goldberg, David Bennet Rodes, Goldberg Persky & White, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.