From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warmke v. Barnhart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 11, 2013
1:11-cv-00370-JAW (D. Me. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

1:11-cv-00370-JAW

01-11-2013

GREG JAMES WARMKE, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA BARNHART, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on November 15, 2012 her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 26). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on December 21, 2012 (ECF No. 29). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 22) be and hereby is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Warmke v. Barnhart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 11, 2013
1:11-cv-00370-JAW (D. Me. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Warmke v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:GREG JAMES WARMKE, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA BARNHART, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

1:11-cv-00370-JAW (D. Me. Jan. 11, 2013)