From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walton v. City of Tunica

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
May 9, 2022
Civil Action 3:20-cv00211-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:20-cv00211-MPM-JMV

05-09-2022

MALAYSIA WALTON PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF TUNICA, MISSISSIPPI, TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, DEPUTY BRANDON SMITH (in his individual and official capacity), DEPUTY BOBBY JEFFERIES (in his individual and official capacity), CAPTAIN WALTER FRENCH (in his individual and official capacity), OFFICER ROOSEVELT EATON (in his individual and official capacity), OFFICER PHILLIP KEYS (in his individual and official capacity) DEFENDANTS

Victoria, Washington, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Wilton V. Byars III, Esq. Marissa Watson, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Roosevelt Eaton and Phillip Keys Daniel Coker Horton & Bell, P.A.


Victoria, Washington, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

Wilton V. Byars III, Esq.

Marissa Watson, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants Roosevelt Eaton and Phillip Keys

Daniel Coker Horton & Bell, P.A.

RULE 54(b) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS ROOSEVELT EATON AND PHILLIP KEYS

HONORABLE MICHAEL P. MILLS, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

COME NOW Plaintiff Malaysia Walton, defendant Roosevelt Eaton, in his individual and official capacities, and defendant Phillip Keys, in his individual and official capacities, by and through their respective counsel, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and/or Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all causes of action against defendants Roosevelt Eaton and Phillip Keys, with each party to bear their own costs.

FURTHER, since Plaintiff continues to pursue her claims against the remaining defendants, these parties request and the Court so finds, that there is no just reason for delaying the entry of a final judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendants Roosevelt Eaton and Phillip Keys pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the plaintiff's claims against defendant Roosevelt Eaton and defendant Phillip Keys are hereby finally dismissed with prejudice and that final judgment is hereby rendered in favor of defendant Roosevelt Eaton and defendant Phillip Keys as provided by Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk is directed to enter the final judgment as set forth herein, thereby making this a final judgment with respect to plaintiff's claims against Roosevelt Eaton and Phillip Keys. Plaintiff may continue to pursue her claims against the remaining defendants.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

APPROVED AND AGREED TO:

Victoria, Washington, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

Wilton V. Byars III, Esq.

Marissa Watson, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants Roosevelt Eaton and Phillip Keys

Presented By:

Wilton V. Byars, III

Marissa Watson

Daniel Coker Horton & Bell, P.A.


Summaries of

Walton v. City of Tunica

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
May 9, 2022
Civil Action 3:20-cv00211-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Walton v. City of Tunica

Case Details

Full title:MALAYSIA WALTON PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF TUNICA, MISSISSIPPI, TUNICA COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:20-cv00211-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. May. 9, 2022)