concluding that, in the context of a similar statute governing social security benefits, "[e]xemption is a protection that does not survive the individual. It is a personal protection which dies with the beneficiary"
Summary of this case from State v. CueNo. 77-902.
February 21, 1978
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE POWELL would grant certiorari. Reported below: 553 F. 2d 964.
concluding that, in the context of a similar statute governing social security benefits, "[e]xemption is a protection that does not survive the individual. It is a personal protection which dies with the beneficiary"
Summary of this case from State v. Cuedetermining that loading practice led to slippery condition on steel-rung ladder thus breaching shipowner's duty of seaworthiness
Summary of this case from Waggon-Dixon v. Royal CaribbeanFull title:A. G. VOLKSWAGENWERK, ET AL. v. HEATRANSFER CORP
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 21, 1978
Personal involvement of defendants in alleged constitutional deprivations is a prerequisite to an award of…
Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Indeed, antitrust law recognizes that economically significant submarkets may exist which themselves…