requiring subcontractor to arbitrate Miller Act payment bond claim pursuant to arbitration provision in subcontract, which provision was not prohibited by the Miller Act
Summary of this case from Humbarger v. the Law Company Inc.No. 612.
October 28, 1966, OCTOBER 28, 1966.
Dismissal Under Rule 60.
C.A. 2d Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court. Jack E. Levine for petitioner. Reported below: 364 F. 2d 705.
requiring subcontractor to arbitrate Miller Act payment bond claim pursuant to arbitration provision in subcontract, which provision was not prohibited by the Miller Act
Summary of this case from Humbarger v. the Law Company Inc.Full title:UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CAPOLINO SONS, INC. v. ELECTRONIC…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 28, 1966
The revisory power granted by Rule 625 over unenrolled judgments is to be liberally exercised, "lest…
U.S. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.Interestingly, even prior to the F.D. Rich decision, courts deciding the issue had held almost without…