From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Yearby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
No. 2:10-cr-00178-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cr-00178-MCE

01-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL YEARBY, et al., Defendants.

BRUCE LOCKE Attorney for Paul Yearby Bruce Locke For HAYES GABLE Attorney for Jake Weathers Bruce Locke For RUSSELL CARLBERG Attorney for the United States


BRUCE LOCKE (#177787)

Moss & Locke

Attorneys for

PAUL YEARBY

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the defendants, Paul Yearby, by and through his defense counsel, Bruce Locke, Jake Weathers, by and through his defense counsel, Hayes Gable, and the United States of America, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Russell Carlberg, that the status conference presently set for January 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., should be continued to February 23, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from January 26, 2012 through February 23, 2012.

The reason for the continuance is that the parties are engaged in discussions to resolve the case without a trial and Mr. Locke needs additional time to arrange for the government to interview Mr. Yearby. Accordingly, the time between January 26, 2012 and February 23, 2012 should be excluded from the Speedy Trial calculation pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv) and Local Codes T-2 for complexity and T-4 for defense preparation. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). Mr. Carlberg and Mr. Gable have authorized Mr. Locke to sign this pleading for them.

_________

BRUCE LOCKE

Attorney for Paul Yearby

Bruce Locke

For HAYES GABLE

Attorney for Jake Weathers

Bruce Locke

For RUSSELL CARLBERG

Attorney for the United States

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Yearby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
No. 2:10-cr-00178-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Yearby

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL YEARBY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cr-00178-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)