From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wendt

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 30, 1972
463 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1568. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

June 30, 1972.

D. Freeman Hutton, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

John W. Stokes, U.S. Atty., Eugene A. Medori, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.



Wendt appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict of guilty of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. We find his contentions that there is insufficient evidence to convict and that the court erroneously failed to give a cautionary instruction contemporaneously with the admission of evidence of a prior conviction to be without merit and affirm.

No motion for a judgment of acquittal was made by Wendt. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence was thus not preserved for appellate review absent a manifest miscarriage of justice. United States v. McGlamory, 5 Cir. 1971, 441 F.2d 130; United States v. Penner, 5 Cir. 1970, 425 F.2d 729. We find none here. On the contrary, the evidence of Wendt's guilt is overwhelming.

Wendt concedes, as he must, that it is proper to impeach the credibility of a defendant by showing prior convictions. United States v. Bland, 5 Cir. 1970, 432 F.2d 96, cert. denied 401 U.S. 912, 91 S.Ct. 877, 27 L.Ed.2d 810; United States v. Justice, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 30. He also concedes that no request for a cautionary instruction was made at any time, although such an instruction was given during the court's charge to the jury. Wendt nevertheless contends that the court's failure to instruct the jury at the time the testimony was given is plain error. Under the circumstances here shown we dismiss this contention as frivolous.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Wendt

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 30, 1972
463 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Wendt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOHN JAMES WENDT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 30, 1972

Citations

463 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wendt

Defendant, who was convicted and sentenced in this court and is now incarcerated in the Federal Correctional…

United States v. Perez

In the Fifth Circuit it is well established that in the absence of a timely motion for judgment of acquittal,…