From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Volarat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00303 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00303 AWI

01-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THANOUSONE VOLARAT, ET AL., Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LAUREL J. MONTOYA Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER


DATE: March 5, 2012

PLACE: Courtroom Two

Honorable Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that the current status conference set for January 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to March 5, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States District Court Judge.

The parties further stipulate and agree that the time between January 23, 2012, and March 5, 2012 be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Specifically, there is further investigation that needs to be completed before the government can make an offer to the defendants and meaningfully negotiate the matter. The defendants have matters pending in another jurisdiction and additional information is needed in order to explore the feasibility of a global resolution. The parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ___________________________

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

___________________________

MARC DAYS

Attorney for Defendant

THANOUSONE VOLARAT

___________________________

DALE BLICKENSTAFF

Attorney for Defendant

PHONEPHITHACK VOLARAT

___________________________

RICHARD BESHWATE, JR.

Attorney for Defendant

ADAM KHAMVONSAY

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Status Conference hearing of January 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. be continued to March 5, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Time shall be excluded to and through that date. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause and the Court finds the ends of justice outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Volarat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00303 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Volarat

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THANOUSONE VOLARAT, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00303 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)