From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. Cr.S-09-222 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. Cr.S-09-222 GEB

01-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MINH THAM, Defendant

Michael B. Bigelow Attorney for Minh Tham Heiko Coppola Assistant United States Attorney


MICHAEL B. BIGELOW Attorney at Law

Attorney for Defendant

Minn Tham

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING

CONDITION OF PRE-TRIAL RELEASE

On August 17, 2009, this Court released the above named defendant pre-trial on release conditions. For the reasons stated below, it is hereby stipulated and agreed between the parties, defendant Minh Tham, thorough his counsel, Michael B. Bigelow and the United States through its counsel, Heiko Coppola, that the conditions of pretrial release be modified as set forth below. This stipulation has been discussed with Pre-Trial Services Officer, Renee Basurto, and she concurs.

Pursuant to Special Condition #13, Mr. Tham has been participating in counseling on a regular basis since his release on conditions. He has been very successful and his counselor has requested termination of counseling.

Accordingly, it is agreed that Mr. Tham's pre-trial release conditions may be modified and that Special Condition #13 be removed. Again, Pre Trial is in agreement.

All other conditions of pre trial release shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

_________________

Michael B. Bigelow

Attorney for Minh Tham

_________________

Heiko Coppola

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED

_________________

Hon. Dale A. Drozd,

United States Magistrate Judge

AMENDED Conditions of Release

Re: Minh Yat Tham

Docket No.: 2:09-CR-0222 JAM

1) You shall report to and comply with the rules and regulations of the Pretrial Services Agency;

2) You shall report in person to the Pretrial Services Agency on the first working day following your release from custody;

3) You are to reside at a location approved by the pretrial services officer and not move or absent yourself from this residence for more than 24 hours without the prior approval of the pretrial services officer;

4) Your travel is restricted to the Eastern District of California and you shall not travel outside of the Eastern District without the prior consent of the pretrial services officer;

5) You shall not possess a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon; additionally, you shall provide written proof of divestment of all firearms currently under your control;

6) You shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol or any use of a narcotic drug or other controlled substance without a prescription by a licensed medical practitioner; and you shall notify Pretrial Services immediately of any prescribed medication(s). However, medicinal marijuana, prescribed or not, may not be used;

7) You shall submit to drug or alcohol testing as directed by the pretrial services officer;

8) You shall seek and/or maintain employment and provide proof of same as requested by your pretrial services officer;

9) You shall obtain no passport during the pendency of this case;

10) You shall not associate or have any contact with any co-defendants outside the presence of counsel; unless in the presence of counsel or otherwise approved in advance by the pretrial services officer;

11) You shall report any contact with law enforcement to your pretrial services officer within 24 hours;

12) You are released to the third-party custody of Loan Craig at 99881 Pipit Way in Elk Grove, California; and

13) You shall submit to DNA testing as directed by the United States Attorney's Office.


Summaries of

United States v. Tham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. Cr.S-09-222 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Tham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MINH THAM, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. Cr.S-09-222 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)