From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2012
NO. CR.S-11-372-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

NO. CR.S-11-372-GEB

01-30-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANA PEREZ-LOPEZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender CARO MARKS, Bar #159267 Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant ANA PEREZ-LOPEZ


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

CARO MARKS, Bar #159267

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

ANA PEREZ-LOPEZ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER;

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME


Date: February 24, 2012

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHELE BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and CARO MARKS, attorney for ANA PEREZ-LOPEZ, that the status conference hearing date of January 27, 2012 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on February 24, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel time to investigate the defendant's unusual background, including gathering witness declarations and amassing records, in order to present the government with sufficient mitigating evidence to justify the defendant's proposed settlement of the case. The defendant's background is extraordinary and the defense needs time to locate specific the evidence, most in the form of documents (e.g., school and income tax records) and witness statements to support this claim. The need for this continuance is also based on the defendant's location two hours away in Nevada City Jail, which can delay attorney-client meetings, as such meetings often take all day.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including February 24, 2012 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Public Defender

_______________

CARO MARKS

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Ana Perez-Lopez

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

Caro Marks for

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the January 27, 2012, status conference hearing be continued to February 24, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the February 24, 2012 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

_______________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Perez-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2012
NO. CR.S-11-372-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Perez-Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANA PEREZ-LOPEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

NO. CR.S-11-372-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)