From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nunley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
CR. S-08-065 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CR. S-08-065 LKK

01-09-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TANEKA RAENEE NUNLEY, Defendants.

TODD D. LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd D. Leras for DAN FRANK KOUKOL Attorney for Defendant TANEKA NUNLEY


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

TODD D. LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff United States of America and Attorney Dan Koukol, Counsel for Defendant Taneka Raenee Nunley, that the status conference scheduled for January 10, 2012, be continued to February 22, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.

The request to continue the status conference is made for several reasons. The parties have recently met to discuss matters related to a proposed resolution of the case. The defense has also presented a counter-proposal requiring follow-up investigation and legal research. The government and defendant agree that an exclusion of time is therefore appropriate under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare). This exclusion of time includes the period from January 10, 2012, up to and including February 22, 2012.

Dan Koukol agrees to this request and has authorized Assistant United States Attorney Todd D. Leras to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

By: _________________

TODD D. LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: Todd D. Leras for

DAN FRANK KOUKOL

Attorney for Defendant

TANEKA NUNLEY

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The status conference set for January 10, 2012, is continued to February 22, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.

2. Based on the stipulations and representations of the parties, the Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare) from January 10, 2012, up to and including February 22, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Nunley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
CR. S-08-065 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Nunley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TANEKA RAENEE NUNLEY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

CR. S-08-065 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)