From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mondragon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
Case No.: 10-473 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 10-473 WBS

01-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAURINO MONDRAGON, et al., Defendants.

HEIKO COPPOLA Attorney for Plaintiff CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ Attorney for Taurino Mondragon DINA SANTOS Attorney for Salvador Mondragon


CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, SBN 207136

Attorney for Defendant

TAURINO MONDRAGON

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME


JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Heiko Coppola, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorneys Clemente M. Jimenez, Counsel for Defendant TAURINO MONDRAGON, and Dina Santos, Counsel for Defendant SALVADOR MONDRAGON, that the status conference scheduled for January 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on February 21, 2012, 9:30 a.m. for further status conference. Defense investigation in this matter is ongoing and requires additional time for completion. Furthermore, counsel seeks additional time to prepare and confer with their respective clients. This request is made as to defendants Taurino Mondragon and Salvador Mondragon only.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

_________

HEIKO COPPOLA

Attorney for Plaintiff

____________

CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ

Attorney for Taurino Mondragon

____________

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Salvador Mondragon

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for January 17, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to February 21, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. for further status conference. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

____________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Mondragon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
Case No.: 10-473 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Mondragon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAURINO MONDRAGON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 10-473 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)