From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McClendon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-cr-00353 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cr-00353 MCE

01-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN McCLENDON, et. al., Defendants

BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney by Scott N. Cameron, for Jean Hobler Assistant U.S. Attorney by Scott N. Cameron Scott N. Cameron Counsel for ANTHONY WILLIAMS by Scott N. Cameron, for Preeti K. Bajwa Counsel for SEAN McCLENDON by Scott N. Cameron, for Douglas Beevers Counsel for Anthony Salcedo


SCOTT N. CAMERON

Attorney at Law

Attorney for:

ANTHONY WILLIAMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE


COURT: Hon. Morrison England, Jr.


Stipulation

The parties, through undersigned counsel, stipulate that the status conference, scheduled for January 26, 2012, may be continued to March 29, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. There are approximately 9,500 pages of discovery in the case as well as recorded statements. The additional time is requested so that defense counsel can continue the review of the discovery, continue investigation, and research possible defenses.

Further, all of the undersigned parties hereby agree and stipulate that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded under Title 18, United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local code T-2 (unusual and complex case) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 26, 2012, to and including March 29, 2012.

The undersigned parties agree and stipulate that with the voluminous discovery, the complex legal issues involved in the case and the time needed by all defendants to review all of the discovery produced by the government to date, it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in § 3161. In addition, the parties stipulate and agree that the continuance requested herein is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time to prepare their respective clients' defenses taking into account due diligence and that the interests of justice in granting this reasonable request for a continuance outweighs the best interests of the public and defendants for a speedy trial in this case, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-2 (unusual and complex case) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare).

The parties have authorized the defense counsel for Anthony Williams to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

by Scott N. Cameron, for

Jean Hobler

Assistant U.S. Attorney

by Scott N. Cameron

Scott N. Cameron

Counsel for ANTHONY WILLIAMS

by Scott N. Cameron, for

Preeti K. Bajwa

Counsel for SEAN McCLENDON

by Scott N. Cameron, for

Douglas Beevers

Counsel for Anthony Salcedo

Order

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that this case is unusual and complex and that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. § 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 26, 2012, to and including March 29, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), and Local Codes T2 (unusual and complex case) and T4 (reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the January 26, 2012, status conference shall be continued until March 29, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. McClendon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-cr-00353 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McClendon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN McCLENDON, et. al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cr-00353 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)