From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Liao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-00056 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-00056 LKK

07-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEX LIAO, et al., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL E. HANSEN Attorney for Defendant BINH LAM MATTHEW SCOBLE Attorney for Defendant ALEX LIAO DWIGHT SAMUEL Attorney for Defendant KEN WONG BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: Michael E. Hansen for TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


Michael E. Hansen [CSBN 191737]

Attorney-at-Law

711 Ninth Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, CA 95814

916.438.7711 FAX 916.864.1359

Attorney for Defendant

BINH LAM

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE,

AND TO EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Todd Leras, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff; Michael E. Hansen, attorney for defendant Binh Lam; Matthew Scoble, attorney for defendant Alex Liao; and Dwight Samuel, attorney for defendant Ken Wong, that the previously-scheduled status conference date of July 10, 2012, be vacated and the matter set for status conference on September 18, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.

This continuance is requested to allow counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

The Government concurs with this request.

Further, the parties agree and stipulate the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare), from the date of the parties' stipulation, July 6, 2012, to and including September 18, 2012.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

______________

MICHAEL E. HANSEN

Attorney for Defendant

BINH LAM

______________

MATTHEW SCOBLE

Attorney for Defendant

ALEX LIAO

______________

DWIGHT SAMUEL

Attorney for Defendant

KEN WONG

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Michael E. Hansen for

TODD LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. section 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, July 6, 2012, to and including September 18, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and Local Code T4 (reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the July 10, 2012, status conference shall be continued until September 18, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Liao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-00056 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Liao

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEX LIAO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-00056 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)