From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Klein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2012
NO. 2:11-cr-00457-GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 2:11-cr-00457-GEB

09-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD RAYMOND KLEIN, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Public Defender MATTHEW SCOBLE Attorney for Defendant RICHARD RAYMOND KLEIN BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
MATTHEW SCOBLE, Bar #237432
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
RICHARD RAYMOND KLEIN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND

TO EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT TO THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


Date: November 2, 2012

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MATTHEW SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for RICHARD RAYMOND KLEIN, that the status conference hearing date of Friday, September 21, 2012, be vacated and a new status conference hearing date of Friday, November 2, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., be set.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses, and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including November 2, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Public Defender

____________________

MATTHEW SCOBLE

Attorney for Defendant

RICHARD RAYMOND KLEIN

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

Matthew Scoble for

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on September 17, 2012, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference hearing currently scheduled for Friday, September 21, 2012, be vacated and that the case be set for Friday, November 2, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' September 17, 2012, stipulation, the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded during the time period from the date of the signing of this order through and including November 2, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.

______________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Klein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2012
NO. 2:11-cr-00457-GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD RAYMOND KLEIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

NO. 2:11-cr-00457-GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2012)