From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Juarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2012
NO. Mag. 12-0207-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

NO. Mag. 12-0207-EFB

09-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY JUAREZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Federal Defender BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar #214897

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

BOBBY LEFTY JUAREZ

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATE FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING;

ORDER EXTENDING TIME


DATE: October 11, 2012

JUDGE: Edmund F. Brennan

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, that the date of, September 11, 2012, for the preliminary hearing shall be vacated and the new date for preliminary hearing shall be October 11, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.

The parties further agree, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.Pro.5.1(c) and (d) that this court should make a finding of good cause for the extension and that in fact good cause is hereby shown. Defense counsel and the government have not had sufficient time to (1) finalize necessary preparation for indictment, and (2) prepare for the preliminary hearing, and (3) finalize negotiations with the defendant and defense counsel about potential settlement of the case. The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that they may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties stipulate that the interest of justice outweighs the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy filing of an indictment or information, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(b),(h)(7)(A), and further that this good cause outweighs the public's interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d).

All parties request the date of October 11, 2012, for the preliminary hearing in this case. The request for extending the date for preliminary hearing is at the specific request of the defendant and with the knowing and voluntary waiver of his Speedy Preliminary Hearing rights under the law. Good cause is thereby shown.

AGREED:

DANIEL J. BRODERICK,

Federal Defender

By ______________________

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ______________________

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. The date for preliminary hearing in this matter is hereby re-set for October 11, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Juarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2012
NO. Mag. 12-0207-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Juarez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY JUAREZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

NO. Mag. 12-0207-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2012)