From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ilyin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Apr 18, 2013
No. CR 12-0467 RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-0467 RS

04-18-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALIK D. ILYIN, Defendants.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney DAMALI A. TAYLOR Assistant United States Attorney MICHAEL STEPANIAN Counsel for ALIK D. ILYIN


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
DAMALI A. TAYLOR (262489)
Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: damali.taylor@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

AND DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF

TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

On April 17, 2013, the parties and the Court agreed to continue the jury trial in this matter, presently set for May 28, 2013, to June 24, 2013 before the Honorable Richard Seeborg.

Counsel for defendant ALIK D. ILYIN, Michael Stepanian, and the government, represented by DAMALI A. TAYLOR, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby agree and stipulate, for both continuity and effective preparation of counsel, that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act until Monday, June 24, 2013, the date for trial. The additional time is necessary to give counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and it is in the best interests of the defendant to do so. The parties agree that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

______________________

DAMALI A. TAYLOR

Assistant United States Attorney

______________________

MICHAEL STEPANIAN

Counsel for ALIK D. ILYIN

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that an exclusion of time through and including June 24, 2013, should be made under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by excluding time through and including June 24, 2013 outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ilyin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Apr 18, 2013
No. CR 12-0467 RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ilyin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALIK D. ILYIN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-0467 RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)