From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Heinen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jul 19, 2012
CASE NO.: 09-CR-00413-MCE-5 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 09-CR-00413-MCE-5

07-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAURA HEINEN Defendant.

Attorney for Defendant LAURA HEINEN


EAN VIZZI, SBN 209444

Attorney for Defendant

LAURA HEINEN

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING

TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY

TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the United States of America, through its attorney of record, Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant U.S. Attorney; and, the defendant Laura Heinen, through her attorney, Ean Vizzi, that the status conference scheduled for July 19, 2012 be continued to September 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. The parties request and agree that exclusion of additional time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow adequate preparation of counsel to work towards negotiation and settlement of this matter.

The parties stipulate and agree that the time from the date of this stipulation, July 17, 2012, through and including September 27, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (time for defense counsel to prepare and continuity of defense counsel).

____________________________

EAN VIZZI

Attorney for Defendant

LAURA HEINEN

____________________________

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: ____________________________

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

*Signed with permission

ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and defendant continuity of counsel. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and that the time from the date of the stipulation, July 17, 2012, to and including September 27, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (time for defense counsel to prepare and continuity of defense counsel).

The status conference scheduled for July 19, 2012 is accordingly continued from July 19, 2012 to September 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Heinen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jul 19, 2012
CASE NO.: 09-CR-00413-MCE-5 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Heinen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAURA HEINEN Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 09-CR-00413-MCE-5 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)