From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-00340 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-00340 AWI

01-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAFAEL DURAN GARCIA, Defendant.

NICHOLAS REYES Attorney for defendant RAFAEL DURAN GARCIA BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIRK E. SHERRIFF Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KIRK E. SHERRIFF

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION RE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER


Court: Two (Hon. Anthony W. Ishii )

The parties stipulate and request that the status conference, currently set for January 9, 2012, be continued to February 6, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. This continued status conference date is requested to allow further time for plea negotiations and defense case preparation. Defense counsel is currently in a several-week trial out of the area. A continuance of the status conference is required to ensure continuity of defense counsel and to provide sufficient time for plea negotiations and defense preparation. The parties agree and stipulate that any delay resulting from this continuance should be excluded in the interests of justice, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(i) & (iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By:_________

NICHOLAS REYES

Attorney for defendant

RAFAEL DURAN GARCIA

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By:_________

KIRK E. SHERRIFF

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The court has reviewed and considered the stipulation of the parties to continue the status conference in this case. It is ordered that, based on the grounds set forth in the stipulation, the status conference is continued from January 9, 2012 to February 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The court finds that, based on the grounds set forth in the parties' stipulation, the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that any delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(i) & (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-00340 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAFAEL DURAN GARCIA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-00340 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)