From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Che

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2012
CR.S. 10-0168-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CR.S. 10-0168-JAM

01-11-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAC CHE, et al., Defendants.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender Supervising Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JULIA SAECHAO


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

Supervising Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JULIA SAECHAO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME


DATE: February 28, 2012

Judge: John A. Mendez

Defendant JULIA SAECHAO, by and through her counsel, DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, TAC CHE by and through his counsel, DONALD MASUDA and KENNY GIFFARD, BOB AN, by and through his attorney, RONALD PETERS, CUONG HOANG, by and through his attorney, SCOTT CAMERON, LIEN TROUNG, by and through his counsel, DINA SANTOS, KENNY LU, by and through his counsel, DAVID FISCHER, VINH HOANG, by and through his counsel, GILBERT ROQUE and the United States Government, by and through its counsel, TODD LERAS, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate that the status conference set for January 17, 2012, be rescheduled for a status conference on Tuesday, February 28, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

This continuance is being requested because defense counsel needs additional time to review discovery, talk to witnesses and pursue investigation.

Furthermore, the party's have been diligently attempting to reach a negotiated disposition in this case and we believe that the additional time will aid us in that attempt.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for February 28, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv), [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Respectfully Submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

___________________________

Supervising Assistant

Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JULIA SAECHAO

___________________________

DONALD MASUDA

Attorney for TAC CHE

___________________________

KENNY GIFFARD

Attorney for TAC CHE

___________________________

RONALD PETERS

Attorney for BOB AN

Dennis S. Waks for

SCOTT CAMERON

Attorney for CUONG HOANG

Dennis S. Waks for

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for LIEN TRUONG

Dennis S. Waks for

DAVID FISCHER

Attorney for KENNY LU

Dennis S. Waks for

GILBERT ROQUE

Attorney for VINH HOANG

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Dennis S. Waks for

TODD LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

SO ORDERED.

___________________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Che

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2012
CR.S. 10-0168-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Che

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAC CHE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

CR.S. 10-0168-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)