From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cassady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cr-00044-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-00044-JAM

01-31-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN CASSADY, Defendant.

WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA Attorney for Dustin Cassady MATTHEW G. MORRIS Assistant United States Attorney


WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA, State Bar No. 106193

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Dustin Cassady

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE STATUS

HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


Dept: The Hon. John A. Mendez

With the Court's permission, it is hereby stipulated between the parties, William J. Portanova, counsel for the defendant herein, and Matthew G. Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for the plaintiff, that the status hearing scheduled for January 31, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. be continued until the 13th of March, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

In addition, the parties stipulate that the time between January 31, 2012 and March 13, 2012 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)) and local code T4 to give counsel time to prepare. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

_________

WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA

Attorney for Dustin Cassady

_________

MATTHEW G. MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff.

v.

DUSTIN CASSADY, Defendant.

Case No. 2:11-cr-00044-JAM

ORDER CONTINUING THE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING AND

EXCLUDING TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

For the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on January 30, 2012, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing set for January 31, 2012, be vacated and that the case be set for a status conference on March 13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly it is ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the parties' stipulation, the time between January 31, 2012 and March 13, 2012, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and local code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with reasonable time to prepare.

_________

THE HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cassady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cr-00044-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cassady

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN CASSADY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-00044-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)