From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CR-0249 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CR-0249 MCE

01-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ALONZO JACKSON BROWN, III, Defendant.

DONALD H. HELLER, SBN 55717 DONALD H. HELLER, A Law Corporation Attorneys for Defendant ALONZO JACKSON BROWN, III


DONALD H. HELLER, SBN 55717

DONALD H. HELLER,

A Law Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant

ALONZO JACKSON BROWN, III

STIPULATION AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, R. Steven Lapham, Assistant United States Attorney, and counsel for defendant Alonzo Jackson Brown, III, Donald H. Heller, Esq. that the status conference presently set for January 5, 2012, be continued to February 2, 2012, at 9:00 A.M. and thus vacating the presently set status conference. The reason for this continuance is that counsel for the government and defendant are engaged in plea negotiations with the intent to either resolve the case by plea agreement before the next scheduled court appearance and change the court appearance from a status conference to a change of plea hearing or in the alternative set a trial date.

It is further stipulated that the time between January 5, 2012, and February 2, 2012, be appropriately be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 USC § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [Local Code T-4]. It is further stipulated that there is a factual basis for this Court to conclude that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DONALD H. HELLER

A Law Corporation

_______________________

DONALD H. HELLER, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

ALONZO JACKSON BROWN, III

__________________

R. STEVEN LAPHAM

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for the United States

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING based on the stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ordered that the January 5, 2012 status conference be continued to February 2, 2012 at 9:00 A.M.

The Court finds based on the stipulation that counsel for the government and defendant are engaged in plea negotiations with the intent to either resolve the case by plea agreement before the next scheduled court appearance and change the court appearance from a status conference to a change of plea hearing or in the alternative set a trial date.

It is further Ordered that the time between January 5, 2012 and February 2, 2012, be appropriately be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 USC § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [Local Code T-4]. The Court further finds that there is a factual basis to conclude that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CR-0249 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ALONZO JACKSON BROWN, III…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CR-0249 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)