From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Adams

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Aug 28, 2024
1:24-cr-10038-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cr-10038-JDB-1

08-28-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY ADAMS, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUPPLEMENT BRIEFS

J. DANIEL BREEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 14, 2024, the Defendant, Timothy Adams, moved to dismiss the indictment in this matter on the grounds that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the statute upon which the indictment rests, is facially unconstitutional as a violation of the Second Amendment and as applied to him. (See Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 19.) The Government responded on August 20, 2024, opposing the relief sought. (D.E. 20).

On August 23, 2024, the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. Williams, F.4th, 2024 WL 3912894 (6th Cir. Aug. 23, 2024), which may impact the outcome of the instant motion. The parties are therefore DIRECTED to supplement their briefs as necessary. Defendant's supplemental filing, if any, is due within fourteen days of the entry of this order, with the Government's response, if any, due fourteen days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

United States v. Adams

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Aug 28, 2024
1:24-cr-10038-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY ADAMS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2024

Citations

1:24-cr-10038-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2024)