From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyson v. Spells

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jan 2, 2024
3:23-cv-272 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-272

01-02-2024

STEVE TYSON, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MIA W. SPELLS, Defendant.


Caroline H. Gentry, Magistrate Judge.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 4)

THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry (Doc. No. 4), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections, if any, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ACCEPTS Magistrate Judge Gentry's analysis and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Applications to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. Nos. 1 & 3) are DENIED. Plaintiff Steve Tyson is hereby ORDERED to pay the Court's full filing fee of $402.00 within thirty (30) days of this Entry and Order.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tyson v. Spells

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jan 2, 2024
3:23-cv-272 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Tyson v. Spells

Case Details

Full title:STEVE TYSON, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MIA W. SPELLS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-272 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2024)