From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 11, 2008
No. CIV S-04-0235-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0235-LKK-CMK-P.

March 11, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

This habeas petition was filed on February 2, 2004. On March 25, 2004, respondents filed an answer to the petition. In their answer, respondents conceded that the four claims raised in the petition are exhausted in that petitioner has presented his claims to the state court. Respondents also indicated, however, that a direct appeal of petitioner's judgment and sentence was pending as of the time the answer was filed. On March 29, 2005, the court stayed the instant federal action pending resolution by the state court of petitioner's appeal. The court administratively closed this case and directed petitioner to file a motion to lift the stay within 20 days of completion of state court proceedings.

This matter has been stayed for almost three years and the court finds it appropriate to obtain a report on the status of state court proceedings. Accordingly, within 30 days of the date of this order, respondents shall file a status report.

This case remains administratively closed pending further order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 11, 2008
No. CIV S-04-0235-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Tucker v. Prosper

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE ORLANDO TUCKER, Petitioner, v. K. PROSPER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 11, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0235-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2008)