From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 23, 1999
526 S.E.2d 146 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)




Trip and fall. Glynn State Court. Before Judge Douglas.

Edward E. Boshears, for appellant.

Lee, Black, Scheer Hart, Steven E. Scheer, Christopher L. Rouse, for appellee.

Mary Ida Tillman and her husband appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. in this trip and fall case.

Mr. Tillman's claim was for loss of consortium.

This Court reviews de novo a trial court's grant of summary judgment, Jackson v. Post Properties, Inc., 236 Ga. App. 701 ( 513 S.E.2d 259) (1999), viewing the evidence below with all inferences in favor of the Tillmans, opponents of summary judgment. Flournoy v. Hospital Authority of Houston County, 232 Ga. App. 791 ( 504 S.E.2d 198) (1998).

So viewing the evidence, it was that Mrs. Tillman regularly visited the Winn-Dixie in her neighborhood, either to shop or just browse. On March 7, 1997, she drove up and parked in front of the store, intending to use a pay phone there. As she arrived, she noticed a temporary display of plants on the sidewalk in front of the store. Mrs. Tillman got out of her car, walked onto the curb, and was looking at the display of flowers and vegetables which was as high as her car's hood. Although she claims she did not realize it before she fell, the display consisted of three tiered shelves. Flowers and plants were displayed on the shelves.

Intending to purchase some plants, she approached the display from the end of the shelves and was walking around it so she could reach the plants more easily. The display was near a big pillar and there was just enough space for a person to walk around it. As she went around the end of the display, she caught her shin on the end of the lowest shelf. Before falling, Mrs. Tillman claims that she did not realize that the lowest shelf extended that far into the sidewalk because the flowers were "[d]raping all over it. All I could see was blooms."

After tripping on the shelf, Mrs. Tillman fell forward and attempted to regain her balance. She nonetheless fell to the ground when her foot caught on a supporting leg of the shelves.

When asked what was wrong with the shelving, Mrs. Tillman stated that "[i]t was tiered, the top shelf, then there was a second shelf, but that wouldn't have tripped anybody. It was that bottom one jutting out there that far."

"The plaintiff's first burden in a premises liability case is to show the premises were defective or hazardous. [Johnston v. Grand Union Co., 189 Ga. App. 270, 271 (1) ( 375 S.E.2d 249) (1988); see Robinson v. Kroger Co., 268 Ga. 735, 740 (1) ( 493 S.E.2d 403) (1997)]." Beman v. K-Mart Corp., 232 Ga. App. 219, 220 (2) ( 501 S.E.2d 580) (1998) (bracketed citations in footnote in original).

Here, there is no evidence that the display was anything other than a simple three-tiered step arrangement. Obviously, any such tiered arrangement will have steps progressively extending from the top step down. Equally obvious is the fact that the flowers and plants were sitting on something — they were not suspended in air.

There is no evidence that the display was negligently designed or constructed and, accordingly, no evidence that it was defective or hazardous.

Therefore, on the record before us, this is one of those cases where the evidence is "plain, palpable, and undisputed" entitling Winn-Dixie to summary judgment.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P.J., and Ruffin, J., concur.


Summaries of

Tillman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 23, 1999
526 S.E.2d 146 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Tillman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Case Details


Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 23, 1999


526 S.E.2d 146 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
526 S.E.2d 146

Citing Cases

Langston v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Thus, no hazard was shown to have existed within the duty of ordinary care owed to the plaintiff under the…

Gibson v. Symbion, Inc.

Here, the record is devoid of any evidence to show that the handicap ramp was improperly designed or…