applying the rule of construction that, if a criminal statute does not specify a "heightened mental element," such as specific intent, general intent is presumed to be the required element
Summary of this case from U.S. v. JacksonNo. 91-1749.
June 22, 1992.
applying the rule of construction that, if a criminal statute does not specify a "heightened mental element," such as specific intent, general intent is presumed to be the required element
Summary of this case from U.S. v. JacksonFull title:TARABISHI v. McALESTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL AKA McALESTER REGIONAL HEALTH…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 22, 1992
An indictment is sufficient if it "set[s] forth the offense in the words of the statute itself, as long as…
Wimbley v. StateAlabama courts have also held that a court must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine if…