From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tadevosyan v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2382 EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2382 EFB

09-20-2012

MANVEL TADEVOSYAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, and has submitted the affidavit required thereunder which demonstrates that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases.

3. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal.

4. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the completed summons, five copies of the complaint, and five copies of the scheduling order, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal.

5. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. Service of process shall be completed by delivering a copy of the summons, complaint, and scheduling order to the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and by sending two copies of the summons, complaint, and scheduling order by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) & (B). The Marshal shall also send a copy of the summons, complaint, and scheduling order by registered or certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security, c/o Office of General Counsel, Region IX, 160 Spear Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA 94105-1545. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2). The United States Marshal shall thereafter file a statement with the court that said documents have been served.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Tadevosyan v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2382 EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Tadevosyan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MANVEL TADEVOSYAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2382 EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2012)