From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Supermarket v. Valley Rich Dairy

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 27, 1998
161 F.3d 3 (4th Cir. 1998)

Summary

holding that negligence did not give rise to a Free Exercise § 1983 claim

Summary of this case from Iceberg v. Martin

Opinion

No. 97-2314, 97-2315.

August 27, 1998.

Appeal from the W.D.Va.; Appealing after remand 71 F.3d 119.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Supermarket v. Valley Rich Dairy

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 27, 1998
161 F.3d 3 (4th Cir. 1998)

holding that negligence did not give rise to a Free Exercise § 1983 claim

Summary of this case from Iceberg v. Martin

affirming district court's refusal to continue trial to allow investigation of witnesses where names were disclosed twenty-four hours before they were expected to testify and where there had been safety and security concerns regarding witnesses

Summary of this case from United States v. Wysinger

In Price, the Fourth Circuit declined to find complete preemption where the collective bargaining agreement at issue was only relevant insofar as its arbitration provision could be used as a defense to the WVHRA claim. 1998 WL 536371, at *7-8.

Summary of this case from Parsons v. Kroger Ltd. P'ship I
Case details for

Supermarket v. Valley Rich Dairy

Case Details

Full title:Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Valley Rich Dairy, Miles v. Valley Rich…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 27, 1998

Citations

161 F.3d 3 (4th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lusk

United States v. Wynn, 684 F.3d 473, 478 (4th Cir. 2012) (citation omitted). Rather, "[t]o be convicted of…

WISHNESKI v. DOÑA ANA COUNTY

Moreover, Wishneski does not allege any facts to indicate that Orr Wittman should have known that he would…