finding that under New Jersey law, statements made to a legislative body are absolutely privileged, even when made voluntarily and not under oath, if the statements are related to the subject matter of proceedings that are properly within the jurisdiction of the legislative body conducting them
Summary of this case from LTL Mgmt. v. MolineNo. 85-1643.
May 27, 1986.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 783 F. 2d 743.
finding that under New Jersey law, statements made to a legislative body are absolutely privileged, even when made voluntarily and not under oath, if the statements are related to the subject matter of proceedings that are properly within the jurisdiction of the legislative body conducting them
Summary of this case from LTL Mgmt. v. Molinegranting interest on a breach of contract claim
Summary of this case from Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Rocket Oil Co.Observing that sections 10 and 11 "have often been deemed the exclusive grounds for vacation or modification" of an arbitration award.
Summary of this case from Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook v. EllisFull title:STROH CONTAINER CO. v. DELPHI INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 27, 1986
ITT and the Globe argue that the Court may not allow the plaintiff to combine other non-actionable…
Lohrenz v. DonnellyIn appealing the grant of summary judgment on her defamation complaint against Elaine Donnelly and the Center…