From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 11, 2022
21-cv-06630-SK (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-06630-SK

04-11-2022

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE INFRINGER IDENTIFIED AS USING IP ADDRESS 73.92.112.166, Defendant.


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

REGARDING DOCKET NOS. 29, 30

SALLIE KIM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff advises the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this case and that Plaintiff expects to file a dismissal with prejudice within twenty-one days. (Dkt. 29.) Defendant simultaneously brings an administrative motion to withdraw the pending motion to dismiss currently set for hearing on April 18, 2022. (Dkt. 30.) All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Dkts. 10, 18.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within twenty-one days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 11, 2022
21-cv-06630-SK (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE INFRINGER IDENTIFIED AS…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 11, 2022

Citations

21-cv-06630-SK (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)