From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Mar 12, 2024
Civil Action 9:24-CV-50 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:24-CV-50

03-12-2024

JOSHUA LYNN STEWART v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

ZACK HAWTHORN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, Johsua Lynn Stewart, an inmate currently confined at the Polunsky Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) allows a district court to “entertain an application for writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A state prisoner is required to file his federal petition for writ of habeas corpus in either the district where the prisoner is incarcerated or the district where the prisoner was convicted and sentenced. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Although both district courts have jurisdiction to entertain the application, “[t]he district court for the district wherein such an application is filed in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice may transfer the application to the other district court for hearing and determination.” Id.

In the present case, Petitioner challenges a conviction from Harris County, Texas located in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. Although Petitioner is incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit located within the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division, this court has discretion to transfer the application to the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division for hearing and determination.

Conclusion

The court has considered the circumstances underlying the particular facts of this case and has determined that the interests of justice would be served by transferring this petition to the division where Petitioner was convicted. Therefore, the petition should be transferred to the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas for hearing and determination. An order transferring the case will be entered by the undersigned.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Mar 12, 2024
Civil Action 9:24-CV-50 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Stewart v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA LYNN STEWART v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Mar 12, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 9:24-CV-50 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2024)