From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wallen

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 3, 1971
266 N.E.2d 561 (Ohio 1971)

Opinion

No. 70-107

Decided February 3, 1971.

Criminal law — Murder during commission of robbery — Evidence — Intent — Appeal — Issues raised not presented below.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

William C. Wallen, appellant herein, represented by court-appointed counsel in the trial court, was convicted on two counts of first degree murder by a three-judge court, without a recommendation of mercy. The first count charged him with first degree murder for the intentional killing of one Harold McCully while perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate robbery. The second count also charged him with first degree murder in that the killing of McCully was the result of deliberate and premeditated malice.

The Court of Appeals for Stark County affirmed the judgment of conviction.

The cause is before this court as a matter of right pursuant to Section 2, Article IV of the Ohio Constitution.

Mr. David D. Dowd, Jr., prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Miss Violet J. Tarcai, for appellant.


The first question which must be considered is whether there is evidence in the record that the appellant intended to rob the deceased at the time he attacked him.

An examination of the record reveals evidence that appellant was destitute; that his girl friend knew the decedent had cashed his pay check that day; that appellant and his girl friend had lived in McCully's apartment for some two weeks, rent free, with McCully furnishing all the food and drinks; that, on the date of the killing, during a drinking bout in McCully's kitchen, appellant suddenly knocked McCully out of a chair onto the floor, where appellant proceeded to beat McCully with his fists and kick him in the face and sides with his combat boots, after which appellant trussed McCully up with wire; and that appellant took $50 from McCully's wallet, then hurriedly left the apartment with his girl friend. Thus, there was sufficient evidence in the record to present a question for the triers of the fact as to whether appellant intended to rob the decedent at the time of the attack.

The coroner testified that decedent had sustained eight stab wounds to the right side of his head and about one-half dozen fractures on each side of his chest. Cause of death was given as acute respiratory arrest due to the lung damage caused by the multiple rib fractures.

Appellant also contends that he was denied representation by counsel because his court-appointed attorney was "inefficient and inadequate." However, the record fails to disclose any evidence to support that contention.

Appellant finally claims a number of errors which, he contends, demonstrate that he was not "constitutionally proved guilty." While our careful examination of those issues raises serious doubt as to their substance, we find no reason to even consider them on their merits because appellant failed to raise them at his trial and in the Court of Appeals below.

It is the policy of this court, from which we are presently disinclined to deviate, to refuse to consider such questions. State v. Jones (1965), 4 Ohio St.2d 13, 211 N.E.2d 198. To entertain such questions now would effectively permit appellant to bypass consideration of those questions by the trial court, or the Court of Appeals.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O'NEILL, C.J., SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, DUNCAN, CORRIGAN, STERN and LEACH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Wallen

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 3, 1971
266 N.E.2d 561 (Ohio 1971)
Case details for

State v. Wallen

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WALLEN, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 3, 1971

Citations

266 N.E.2d 561 (Ohio 1971)
266 N.E.2d 561

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

The fact that the appellant raises a federal constitutional question does not charge this court's conclusion.…

State v. Pruett

The defendant had counsel below and did not raise, in the trial court, the failure to appoint counsel at her…