From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb 22, 2022
333 So. 3d 438 (La. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2021-KH-01931

02-22-2022

STATE of Louisiana v. Darrell TAYLOR


Writ application denied. See per curiam.

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb 22, 2022
333 So. 3d 438 (La. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Darrell TAYLOR

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Feb 22, 2022

Citations

333 So. 3d 438 (La. 2022)