From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. LUND

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 8, 2006
919 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-1272.

November 30, 2005. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied February 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, J.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Robin F. Hazel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Billie Jan Goldstein, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


The State appeals a downward departure sentence. The trial court sentenced the defendant to 366 days as a habitual violent felony offender with credit for time served. The State objected on the ground that the sentence fell below the sentencing guidelines. We reverse because the downward departure sentence was not supported by any written reasons, and the oral reasons given were legally insufficient. See § 921.0026, Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Perez, 802 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for the trial court to resentence the defendant, or allow the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. State v. Meyers, 708 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Sentence vacated, reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

STATE v. LUND

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 8, 2006
919 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

STATE v. LUND

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Odvar LUND, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

919 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)