From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spurling v. HealthComp, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 29, 2017
Case No. 6:16 CV 01043-JR (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 6:16 CV 01043-JR

06-29-2017

MICHAEL SPURLING, Plaintiff, v. HEALTHCOMP, INC., MARKET OF CHOICE, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation on June 16, 2017. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 29 day of June, 2017.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Spurling v. HealthComp, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 29, 2017
Case No. 6:16 CV 01043-JR (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Spurling v. HealthComp, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SPURLING, Plaintiff, v. HEALTHCOMP, INC., MARKET OF CHOICE, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 29, 2017

Citations

Case No. 6:16 CV 01043-JR (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2017)